HHSRS VERSION 2
SEPTEMBER 2004
UNCOMBUSTED FUEL GAS
HHSRS VERSION 2
Vulnerable age
Related hazards
All ages
Explosions, Carbon Monoxide etc
Multiple locations
Yes
No
Secondary hazards
Yes
No
Front elevation
A) Gas fire to ground floor front room
[Main photo stretched to fit exactly between
lines}
Rear elevation
Rear elevation
DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDS
Dwelling:
1920s semi-detached house
LIST OF RELEVANT MATTERS
LIKELIHOOD
A
OUTCOME
A
a
Gas supply
-
a
Gas detector provision
2
b
Gas installation
3
b
Defects to detectors
3
c Gas appliances
3
d
Maintenance defects
3
# Secondary hazard
A
e
Siting of appliances
3
-
None
-
Key
3
Seriously defective
1 Not satisfactory
2
Defective
- Satisfactory/NA
Gas pipe and fire: The gas fire fitted into the open fireplace in the front living room is old and
obsolete. The joint between the fire and the opening is unsealed. However, more relevant is that the
movement of the gas fire has loosened the joint between the pipe and the gas tap. There is no
permanent means of ventilation to the room. Neither the fire nor the gas installations have been
checked or serviced over the last five years.
A)
Improved
A B C D E F G H
I
Average likelihood, outcomes and HHSRS score for uncombusted fuel gas for all persons in
1920-45 houses.
Score
HHSRS VERSION 2
SEPTEMBER 2004
HEALTH AND SAFETY RATING SYSTEM SCORES
1920-45 House
1 in
10
LIKELIHOOD
Low
High
Average: 117,830
Example
10
< 4200 2400 1300 750 420 240 130
75
42
24
13
7.5
4
2.5
1.5 >
Justification
OUTCOMES
Class I
Class II
Class III
Class IV
Justification
RATING
Whether or not the fire is in use, there is a significant likelihood of uncombusted gas
leaking into the room. With no means of permanent ventilation (particularly at high level)
the gas will accummulate within the room.
%
Average: 1.2
1.0
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
7
15
26
38 >
Av: 2.3
2.2
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
7
15
26
38 >
Av: 41.4
46.4
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
7
15
26
38 >
Av: 55.1
50.4
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
7
15
26
38 >
14
1.0
2.2
46.4
50.4
There is nothing to suggest that the harm outcomes will differ from the average.
Example
B
Average: < 1
C D E F G H
I
J
A
2662
Score
RATING SCORES AFTER IMPROVEMENT
IMPROVE
Justification
NEW RATING
Av: Nos
Likelihood to
1 in 1,800
Outcomes to
1.0
2.2 46.4 50.4 %
The gas installations and this gas fire (and any other gas appliances) should be properly
tested and any works carried out. This would probably include renewal of the fire and of
the pipe work. In addition, permanent means of ventilation (at high level) should be
installed. These works would reduce the likelihood substantially but this would still
remain higher than average due to the presence of individual gas appliances in the
habitable rooms.
Av: <1
J