HHSRS VERSION 2

HHSRS VERSION 2

SEPTEMBER 2004

FALLS ON THE LEVEL

Yes

Yes

No

No

Vulnerable group

Related hazards

A) Front entrance steps

Front elevation

Persons aged 60 years or over

None

Multiple locations

Secondary hazards

Rear elevation

C) Drain cover

B) Patio door

C) Path to rear

DESCRIPTION OF HAZARD/S

Dwelling:

1980's, 3 bedroomed house

A)

B)

C)

Front entrance steps: The two concrete paving slabs forming the main entrance steps from the brick paved

common parking area to the front porch are sloping and very unevenly laid. In front of the steps there are low

brick walls forming an entrance and the two sides of the open porch.

Patio door: The patio door has a 250 mm high threshold step and is outward opening. The door has two large

areas of glazing, both fitted with safety glass.

Path to rear: A path of concrete slabs leads from the front, around the side and rear of the dwelling to the patio

area. A drop at the angle of the front and side sections is unguarded. The partially covered rear section is

particularly uneven and includes a raised drainage cover.

LIST OF RELEVANT MATTERS

LIKELIHOOD

A

B

a

Lack of floor surface

-

-

b

Excessive slope

2

-

c

Uneven surface

3

-

d

Trip steps/threshold

2

2

e

Disrepair

3

-

f

Poor slip resistance

1

-

g

Inadequate drainage

1

-

h

Inadequate space

-

-

i

Poor lighting or glare

2

1

j

Thermal efficiency

-

-

C

OUTCOMES

-

a

Hard surfaces

-

b

Projections etc

3

c

Nature of area

-

d

Thermal efficiency

A

2

3

1

1

B

C

2

2

1

3

1

-

1

-

-

1

1

-

3

-

# Secondary hazards

i

Brick guarding

ii

Glass door

A

B

3

-

-

-

C

-

-

2

iii

Water tap

-

-

Key

3

Seriously defective

2

Defective

1

Not satisfactory

- Satisfactory/NA

A B C D E F G H

I

J

Likelihood to

1 in

180

Outcomes to

0.1 21.5 31.6 46.8 %

Providing new front steps and having a wide level platform outside the patio doors,

would reduce the likelihood of a fall, as would extending the side fence at the front,

lowering the raised drainage cover and relaying the paving slabs along the side and rear

path. However, with no change to the porch, the spread of harms would remain similar.

Av: 236 Example

IMPROVE

Justification

NEW RATING

Av: Nos

Average likelihood, outcomes and HHSRS score for falls on level by persons aged 60

years or more in and around post-1979 houses, 1997-99.

Score

180

HHSRS VERSION 2

SEPTEMBER 2004

HEALTH AND SAFETY RATING SYSTEM SCORES

Post 1979 House

LIKELIHOOD

1 in

100

Low

High

Average: 126 Example

100

< 4200 2400 1300 750 420 240 130

75

42

24

13

7.5

4

2.5

1.5 >

Justification

OUTCOMES

Class I

Class II

Class III

Class IV

Justification

RATING

The uneven steps to the front porch, the height of the threshold to the rear patio door

and the way this opens outward, all increase the risk of a fall when entering or exiting

the dwelling.

Although probablly used less, the lack of guarding, uneveness and

projecting drainage cover encountered on the side and rear pathway, also increase the

likelihood of a fall somewhat above average for houses built in 1980 and after.

%

Average: 0.1

0.1

< 0.05 0.15 0.3

0.7

1.5

3

7

15

26

38 >

Av:13.8

21.5

< 0.05 0.15 0.3

0.7

1.5

3

7

15

26

38 >

Av: 33.9

31.6

< 0.05 0.15 0.3

0.7

1.5

3

7

15

26

38 >

Av: 52.2

46.8

0.1

21.5

31.6

46.8

< 0.05 0.15 0.3

0.7

1.5

3

7

15

26

38 >

The risk of a severe accident is increased by the prevalence of hard surfaces and sharp

edges around the dwelling and the secondary hazards, particularly, the low brick walls to

the porch which are in the possible line of a fall from the front steps and the projecting

water tap in the rear wall close to the raised drainage cover.

Example Average: 201

A B C D E F G H

I

J

324

Score

RATING SCORES AFTER IMPROVEMENT