HHSRS VERSION 2
SEPTEMBER 2004
COLD
Persons aged 60 years or over
Damp and Mould Growth
EXCESS
Vulnerable group
Related hazards
Front elevation
HHSRS VERSION 2
Multiple locations
Yes
No
Secondary hazards
Yes
No
Hot water tank
DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDS
Dwelling:
1950s non-traditional semi-detached house, similar
to the BISF design.
Background: The walls are of steel frame constrution, faced externally with vertical steel sheeting.
Intenally the walls are finished with plasterboard supported on timber frames.
A) Heating: This was originally by open fires throughout. At sometime, the open fireplaces to
the first floor were sealed and gas fires fitted to the two ground floor living rooms. The
occupier uses portable electric heaters to supplement the gas fires.
B) Insulation: The original construction included glasswool quilting hung within the external wall
frame, and a thin (50mm) layer to the whole of the roof space. There is no insulation to the
hot water tank and the windows are single glazed.
LIST OF RELEVANT MATTERS
LIKELIHOOD & OUTCOMES
A
B
# Secondary hazards
A
B
a)
Thermal insulation
-
3
-
None
-
-
b)
Dampness
-
c)
Settling of insulation
-
3
d)
Type of heating provision
2
-
e)
Size of heating system
3
-
f)
Installation & maintenance
3
-
g)
Controls to heating system
3
-
h)
Amount of ventilation
-
Key
3
Seriously defective
I)
Ventilation controls
-
2
Defective
j)
Disrepair to ventilation
-
-
1
Not satisfactory
k)
Draughts/excess ventilation
-
-
Satisfactory/NA
A B C D E F G H
I
J
Average likelihood, outcomes and HHSRS score for excessive cold for persons aged 60
years or more in 1964-1979 Non-HMOs and all dwellings, 1997-99.
HHSRS VERSION 2
SEPTEMBER 2004
HEALTH AND SAFETY RATING SYSTEM SCORES
1945-79 House
LIKELIHOOD
Low
High
1 in
32
Example
32
42
24
13
7.5
4
2.5
1.5 >
Average: 400
< 4200 2400 1300 750 420 240 130
75
Justification
OUTCOMES
Class I
Class II
Class III
Class IV
Justification
RATING
The two gas fires are not capable of heating the whole of the dwelling. The insulation,
even as original, would be considered inadequate now, and has settled over the years
to become less effective. The result is that the likelihood of the dwelling being
unhealthily cold is increased.
%
Average: 34.0
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
Av: 6.0
4.6
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
31.6
7
15
26
7
15
26
Av: 18.0
21.5
7
15
26
31.6
38 >
4.6
38 >
21.5
Score
327
38 >
Av: 42.0
42.3
42.3
7
15
26
38 >
Although the likelihood of a harmful occurrence is much higher than average, there is
nothing to indicate that spread of harms will vary from the average.
Example
A B C
Average: 880
D E F G H
I
J
Score 10233
RATING SCORES AFTER IMPROVEMENT
IMPROVE
Justification
NEW RATING
Av: Nos
Improved
Likelihood to
1 in 1,000
Outcomes to
31.6 4.6 21.5 42.3 %
Installing an efficient heating system capable of heating the whole of the dwelling and
providing additional thermal insulation to the external walls and the roof space would
reduce the rating around the average for dwellings of this age group (Band D).
Installing double glazing would further the reduce the likelihood to band E.
Av: 880