HHSRS VERSION 2
SEPTEMBER 2004
WITH BATHS ETC
Persons aged 60 years and over
Structural Collapse etc, Dampness
FALLS
Vulnerable age
Related hazards
Head of bath
HHSRS Version 2
Multiple locations
Yes
No
Secondary hazards
Yes
No
Front elevation
Rear elevation
Bath legs at head
Bath legs at foot
DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDS
Dwelling: 1920-45 semi-detached house
Background: This is a four bedroomed inter-war semi-detached house which has a centrally located
bathroom with a window in the flank wall. The house, including the bathroom, has been the subject of
DIY modernisation over the years, but all works have been done to a low standard.
Bath: To provide a level footing for the four feet of the bath, old white shelving has been placed over
the old uneven floor boards. However, no fixing has been provided and with the use of the bath, the
boards have now shifted and the feet become dislodged, causing the bath to be unstable and liable
to rock. The bath itself has a narrow rim, no grab rails and a rounded bottom with no patterning to
increase friction. Elsewhere on the bathroom floor, plywood has been laid over the uneven boards
and varnished, and now covered with loose rugs.
OUTCOMES
A
a
Projections
-
b
Inadequate space
-
c
Space heating
-
# Secondary hazard
None
-
Key
3 Seriously defective
2 Defective
1 Not satisfactory
-
Satisfactory/NA
A)
LIST OF RELEVANT MATTERS
LIKELIHOOD
A
a
Poor friction
3
b
Siting of taps, wastes etc
-
c
Handles and grab rails
3
d
Unstable appliance
3
e
Inadequate space
-
f
Inadequate lighting
-
g
Glare
-
h
Space heating
-
Average likelihood, outcomes and HHSRS score for hazards for falls associated with baths
for persons aged 60 years or over in 1920-45 houses, 1997-99
5
Score
HHSRS VERSION 2
SEPTEMBER 2004
HEALTH AND SAFETY RATING SYSTEM SCORES
1920-45 House
LIKELIHOOD
1 in
32
Low
High
Average: 3,861
Example
32
< 4200 2400 1300 750 420 240 130
75
42
24
13
7.5
4
2.5
1.5 >
Justification
OUTCOMES
Class I
Class II
Class III
Class IV
Justification
RATING
The risk of a fall associated with the bath is substantially increased by the fact that it is no
longer stable and liable to rock significantly as a person gets in and out of the bath.
The
risk is further exacerbated by the old fashioned design of the bath, with its deep rounded
bottom and lack of surface friction, narrow rim and lack of any grab handles. There is
also a danger of slipping on the varnished floor, even discounting the loose rugs, when
getting in or out of the bath.
%
Average: 2.4
2.2
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
7
15
26
38 >
Av: 5.9
4.6
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
7
15
26
38 >
Av: 4.4
4.6
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
7
15
26
38 >
Av: 87.3
88.6
2.2
4.6
4.6
88.6
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
7
15
26
38 >
Although the likelihood of a fall associated with the bath is significantly higher than
average, the health outcomes are judged to be average as there are no secondary
hazards or other additional compounding matters in the bathroom to suggest that the
scores should be increased. However, with the high likelihood the resulting HHSRS
rating is band D.
Average: 8
I
J
Example
A B C D E F G H
902
Score
RATING SCORES AFTER IMPROVEMENT
IMPROVE
Justification
NEW RATING
Av: Nos
Likelihood to
1 in 5,600
Outcomes to
2.2
4.6
4.6 88.6 %
The floor beneath the bath needs to be made level, either by replacing the old boards or
by covering with suitable plywood sheeting. Making the bath fully stable by providing new
fully fixed bath supports would reduce the likelihood significantly. However, replacing the
bath with one with a flat textured non-slip bottom and grab handles either side, or on the
wall above the bath, would reduce the score to better than average for this age of
dwelling.
Improved
A B C D E F G H
I
J