HHSRS VERSION 2
SEPTEMBER 2004
HHSRS VERSION 2
Multiple locations
Yes
No
Secondary hazards
Yes
No
Front elevation
NOISE
Vulnerable age
Related hazards
Train passing window
All ages
None
# Secondary hazards
-
None
Key
3
2
1
-
LIST OF RELEVANT MATTERS
LIKELIHOOD & OUTCOMES
A
a
Site of dwelling
3
b
Internal insulation
-
c
External insulation
3
d
Disrepair - windows/doors
2
e
Siting of plumbing etc
-
f
Equipment - noisy
-
g
Door closers
-
A
-
Seriously defective
Defective
Not satisfactory
Satisfactory/NA
Rear boundary fence
A)
View through first floor rear
room window
DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDS
Dwelling: 5 storey Victorian mid-terraced house.
Background: The dwelling being assessed is a ground floor flat in a five storey (including basement
and attic) mid terraced house converted into five self contained flats. Entry to the flat, which
comprises a living room at the front of the house and bedroom and kitchen at the rear, plus an
internal bathroom, is from the common hall.
Location of house: The house is located next to a parade of shops on a main arterial road running
out of London. This road provides access to the motorway and is used by heavy goods vehicles as
well as for long distance and local car journeys.
Immediately behind the short rear yard and garden
is the main London to Scotland rail line. The line is used by high speed trains, local diesel trains and
goods trains. The main living room of the flat overlooks the main road and the bedroom and kitchen
the rail line. All windows are traditional single glazed double hung sashes, and many particularly at
the rear are ill-fitting and in disrepair.
A)
A B C D
Improved
E
Av: 7
F G H
I
J
Average likelihood, outcomes and HHSRS score for hazards associated with noise for all
persons in pre 1920 houses in multiple occupation (HMO)..
Score
271
HHSRS VERSION 2
SEPTEMBER 2004
HEALTH AND SAFETY RATING SYSTEM SCORES
Pre 1920 Non s.c. Flat
LIKELIHOOD
1 in
2
Example
2
2.5
1.5 >
Low
High
Average: 620
< 4200 2400 1300 750 420 240 130
75
42
24
13
7.5
4
Justification
OUTCOMES
Class I
Class II
Class III
Class IV
Justification
RATING
There is no way the habitable rooms in the flat can be used without suffering from the
noise caused by the road and train traffic. It would interfere with all activities, including
sleeping patterns. While some people may be more tolerant of traffic noise than others,
the likelihood of it causing some adverse health effects to a typical resident at some
period during a year's exposure would be very high.
%
Average: 0.0
0.0
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
7
15
26
38 >
Av: 1.0
1.0
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
7
15
26
38 >
Av: 9.0
10.0
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
7
15
26
38 >
Av: 90.0
89.0
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
7
15
26
38 >
Likelihood to
1 in 18
Outcomes to
0
1.0 10.0 89 %
Secondary glazing should be fitted to all windows (or double glazing with a sufficient gap
between the panes to reduce noise penetration). However, because of its position, it will
not be practicable to reduce the problem to the average levels.
0.0
1.0
10.0
89.0
Despite the likelihood being high, the fact that the noise is largely confined to general
road and rail traffic noise and does not arise from specific disturbances caused by
neighbours, means that the health outcomes are unlikely to any higher than average for
this hazard. However, due to the very high incidence, the HHSRS result is still very high
with a score of 2445 and band B rating.
Example
B
A
Average: 7
C D E F G H
I
J
2445
Score
RATING SCORES AFTER IMPROVEMENT
IMPROVE
Justification
NEW RATING
Av: Nos