-
HHSRS VERSION 2
SEPTEMBER 2004
DAMP AND MOULD GROWTH
HHSRS VERSION 2
Yes
Yes
No
No
Vulnerable age
Related hazards
Rear elevation
Persons aged under 15 years
Excessive cold
A) Door to patio
Multiple locations
Secondary hazards
B) Dormer to top floor rear room
C) Ceiling and walls to rear room
Dwelling : Top floor flat in a Victorian terraced house
(HMO).
DESCRIPTION OF HAZARD⁄S
Background: The house generally is in a poor state of repair. The top floor flat is on two levels, the upper floor
being the attic. There is access from the lower floor onto a patio - the flat roof of the back addition.
Rear main wall: The wall is severely affected by dampness. The roof allows water to soak downwards, and the
eavesgutters leak soaking the outside of the wall and allowing water to bounce up from the "patio". The plaster is
perished and there is mould gowth spreading from the floor.
Rear attic room: There are slipped slates and ill fitting flashings around the dormer opening. Damp has
penetrated soaking the ceiling and walls to the rear attic room.
LIST OF RELEVANT MATTERS
LIKELIHOOD & OUTCOMES
A
B&C
A
B&C
1
2
3
4
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
Rising damp
Penetrating damp
Condensation
-
-
-
I
Plumbing⁄waste pipes
j
Rain water goods
k
Roof⁄sub-floor spaces
l
Small room sizes
# Secondary hazards
None
3
3
3
-
-
-
Mould growth
2
Energy efficiency
3
3
Background ventilation
-
-
Extract ventilation
Clothes drying facilities
-
-
Damp proofing
-
-
Disrepair
3
3
Exposed water tanks etc
-
-
Water using appliances
-
-
-
-
A
B&C
-
-
Key
3
Seriously defective
2
Defective
1
Not satisfactory
-
Satisfactory⁄NA
A)
B&C
The minimum works would be to strip and properly recover the whole of roof; to renew
the rainwater goods; and remove all damp affected plaster and replaster and redecorate
the walls. This would reduce the likelihood to near the average for the age of the
property. (Clearly, other works are required to the premises as a whole.)
Improved Av:11
Score:
15
Average likelihood, outcomes and HHSRS score for hazards from damp & mould by
persons aged under 15 years in pre 1920 HMOs and all dwellings,1997-99.
Justification
NEW RATING
Av: Nos
IMPROVE
Likelihood to
1 in
320
Outcomes to
0
1.0 10.0 89.0
%
Example
RATING
RATING SCORES AFTER IMPROVEMENT
Average: 11
Score:
2445
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
7
15
26
38 >
Although there is some mould growth, it is not that serious. The over-riding problem is
the dampness, and there is nothing to suggest the outcomes would differ from the
average.
%
0.0
1.0
10.0
89.0
Average: 0.0
0.0
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
7
15
26
38 >
Av: 1.0
1.0
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
7
15
26
38 >
Av: 10.0
10.0
< 0.05 0.15 0.3
0.7
1.5
3
7
15
26
38 >
Av: 89.0
89.0
The presence of such severe dampness and the mould growth means there is a very
high likelihood of a harmful occurrence over the next twelve months. The condition
would also have a psychological effect on any occupant.
Justification
OUTCOMES
Class I
Class II
Class III
Class IV
Justification
240 130
75
42
24
13
7.5
4
2.5
1.5 >
420
< 4200 2400 1300 750
Average: 430
Example
2
1 in
2
Low
High
LIKELIHOOD
HHSRS VERSION 2
SEPTEMBER 2004
HEALTH AND SAFETY RATING SYSTEM SCORES
Pre 1920 non s.c. Flat